Blog


Managing Expectations
 17 February 2018, 03:46
Blog, 全部博文, 新加坡法律知识


Oftentimes when clients instruct us in a matter they often exhort us to “fight for them”.

Of course we understand them to mean that we should do outmost in handling their matter but I take this opportunity to explain the fallacy and limitation of this instructions.

For a civil litigation this exhortation is more relevant. In such a situation our client would either be commencing a legal proceedings against another legal entity or individual. Alternatively we could assisting our client to defend such a proceedings by another party.

In such a case we will not doubt doggedly either pursue the case or defend the action whichever is the case.

However on the other hand if we are representing the client in criminal proceedings such instructions maybe difficult to carry out in certain scenarios. For example if the evidence adduced by the prosecution is stacked against our client. In such a case we have to make a realistic assessment.

And the appropriate advice is to ask the client to plead guilty. We would face an uphill if not an impossible task if we would insist a fight to the very end.

Another situation would be if we are to help our client write to certain government agencies or statutory boards to make an exception. Often these government bodies or statutory boards have very rigid rules and it is not easy to ask them to make exceptions for our clients. In such a case failure to persuade the department to change their stand to suit our client would often attract criticism that we are not fighting hard enough for our clients. Few people realise for such a case it’s take time and persistence in trying to get the departments to make an exception for our clients.

As lawyers once instructed we will do our utmost to assist our client. We will fearlessly pursue our clients’ objectives. However it takes strategy, planning and most importance patience to get these thing down. However these are not easily perceived by our client and sometimes they harboured suspicions of our effectiveness.


  Tags   N/A    |       Comments (0)


Search
Popular Posts
Singapore Law Watch  3 October 2016
颜色与商标  16 January 2015
What if missing Malaysia Airlines plane is never found  3 March 2014
中国官场小说  4 February 2013

Disclaimer

The material (including photographs) contained on this website is protected by copyright. You may use this website only for your personal and non-commercial purposes. You must not use, copy, modify, transmit, reproduce, publish or distribute the material on this website, or create any other material using material on this web site, without obtaining the prior written consent of Chung Ting Fai. To obtain the written consent, you may email to: chung_tf@yahoo.com.sg

I was involved in all the cases I have described and all the factual details are based on my first hand knowledge. In telling my stories, however, I have confronted constraints. A lawyer has an obligation to keep his client’s secrets confidential. I have therefore, unless otherwise expressly stated changed the names and other identifying details, I have however not altered the facts of the crimes.
I have endeavored to write an honest memoir without revealing confidence, so I have told these stories in a way that is faithful to the truth as well as the individuals they feature.